> 新闻 > 国内新闻 > 正文

一代女皇

F1众车手谈周冠宇撞车事故_我的网站

金砖五国

A |     DUBAI, United Arab Emirates -- While revealing new details about one of the most famed CIA operations of all times — the spiriting out of six American diplomats who escaped the 1979 U.S. Embassy seizure in Iran — the intelligence agency for the first time has acknowledged something else as well.The CIA now officially describes the 1953 coup it backed in Iran that overthrew its prime minister and cemented the rule of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi as undemocratic.Other American officials have made similar remarks in the past, but the CIA's acknowledgment in a podcast about the agency's history comes as much of its official history of the coup remains classified 70 years after the putsch. That complicates the public's understanding of an event that still resonates, as tensions remain high between Tehran and Washington over the Islamic Republic's rapidly advancing nuclear program, its aiding of militia groups across the Mideast and as it cracks down on dissent. The “CIA’s leadership is committed to being as open with the public as possible," the agency said in a statement responding to questions from The Associated Press. "The agency’s podcast is part of that effort — and we knew that if we wanted to tell this incredible story, it was important to be transparent about the historical context surrounding these events, and CIA’s role in it.”In response to questions from the AP, Iran's mission to the United Nations described the 1953 coup as marking “the inception of relentless American meddling in Iran’s internal affairs” and dismissed the U.S. acknowledgments.“The U.S. admission never translated into compensatory action or a genuine commitment to refrain from future interference, nor did it change its subversive policy towards the Islamic Republic of Iran,” the mission said in a statement. The CIA's podcast, called “The Langley Files” as its headquarters is based in Langley, Virginia, focused two recent episodes on the story of the six American diplomats' escape. While hiding at the home of the Canadian ambassador to Iran, a two-man CIA team entered Tehran and helped them fly out of the country while pretending to be members of a crew scouting for a made-up science fiction film.The caper, retold in the 2012 Academy Award-winning film “Argo” directed by and starring Ben Affleck, offered a dramatized version of the operation, with Affleck playing the late CIA officer Antonio “Tony” Mendez. The podcast for the first time identified the second CIA officer who accompanied Mendez, naming him as agency linguist and exfiltration specialist Ed Johnson. He previously only had been known publicly by the pseudonym “Julio.”“Working with the six — these are rookies," Johnson recounts in an interview aired by the podcast. "They were people who were not trained to lie to authorities. They weren’t trained to be clandestine, elusive.” But in the podcast, another brief exchange focuses on the 1953 coup.In it, CIA spokesman and podcast host Walter Trosin cites the claims of agency historians that the majority of the CIA’s clandestine activities in its history “bolstered” popularly elected governments.“We should acknowledge, though, that this is, therefore, a really significant exception to that rule,” Trosin says of the 1953 coup.CIA historian Brent Geary, appearing on the podcast, agrees.“This is one of the exceptions to that," Geary says.Seven decades later, the 1953 coup remains as hotly debated as ever by Iran, its theocratic government, historians and others. Iran's hard-line state television spent hours discussing the coup that toppled Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh on its anniversary in June. In their telling, a straight line leads from the coup to the 1979 Islamic Revolution that ultimately toppled the fatally ill shah. It still fuels the anti-Americanism that colors decisions made by the theocracy, whether in arming Russia in its war on Ukraine or alleging without evidence that Washington fomented the recent nationwide mass protests targeting it. From the U.S. side, the CIA's hand in the coup quickly was revealed as a success of Cold War espionage, though historians in recent years have debated just how much influence the agency's actions had. It also led the CIA into a series of further coups in other countries, including Guatemala, where American clandestine action in 1954 installed a military dictator and sparked a 40-year civil war that likely killed some 245,000 people.That's led to an American political reappraisal of the 1953 CIA action in Iran. Then-Secretary of State Madeleine Albright acknowledged the U.S.' "significant role" in the coup in 2000. President Barack Obama, speaking in Cairo in 2009, described the CIA's work as leading to the “overthrow of a democratically elected Iranian government.” But largely absent from the discussion was the CIA itself. After years of conflicting versions of the coup both in public and classified papers, a member of the CIA's own in-house team of historians wrote a reappraisal of the operation in a 1998 paper titled “Zendebad, Shah!” in Farsi — or “Long Live the Shah!”But despite a series of American historical documents being made public, including a major tranche of State Department papers in 2017, large portions of that CIA reappraisal remain heavily redacted despite attempts to legally pry them loose by the George Washington University-based National Security Archive. That's even after pledges by former agency directors Robert Gates and James Woolsey Jr. in the 1990s to release documents from that coup and others engineered by the agency. Further complicating any historical reckoning is the CIA's own admission that many files related to the 1953 coup likely had been destroyed in the 1960s.“It’s wrong to suggest that the coup operation itself has been fully declassified. Far from it," said Malcolm Byrne of the National Security Archive. "Important parts of the record are still being withheld, which only contributes to public confusion and encourages myth-making about the U.S. role long after the fact.”。    

“我没事,很幸运还可以站在这里,HALO(系统)救了我。”中国F1车手周冠宇在4日凌晨通过社交平台报平安。

B | 在3日进行的2022年F1大奖赛英国站中,周冠宇在起步后进入第一个弯角时遭遇严重车祸,他的赛车被侧后方拉塞尔驾驶的赛车撞击后飞离赛道。事故发生后,拉塞尔第一时间下车观察周冠宇的情况,作为F1车手协会(GPDA)理事的他表示:“我想去看看周(冠宇)是否需要帮助。这是令人难以置信的可怕事件,我们需要考虑避免赛车被困在障碍物和金属栅栏之间的狭小空间,周冠宇被困在那里什么都做不了。F1赛事需要从这次事故中吸取教训。”英国广播公司(BBC)称,拉塞尔与皮埃尔·加斯利首先发生碰撞,此后,前者驾驶的赛车以每小时200英里的速度撞上周冠宇,中国车手的赛车在倒扣情况下高速撞击到场边围栏,并冲向看台。英国《卫报》称,在这一过程中,HALO系统保护了车手的头部,在本次事故中被波及的威廉姆斯车队车手阿尔本也确认安全。夺得本站冠军的法拉利车手卡洛斯·塞恩斯赛后表示:“车手从(撞坏的赛车)平安离开真是不可思议。这件事情表明,尽管我们有时会批评国际汽联,但你必须知道他们为车手提供了多少帮助。

C | 如果你看到F2赛事中的事故和HALO的作用就会明白,这一系统挽救了车手生命。”

塞恩斯所说的事故,是此前一天进行的F2比赛中,豪格的赛车爆胎后压到路肩,随后直接起飞压在尼萨尼的赛车顶上,HALO系统让两位车手幸免于难。而在上赛季F1赛场上,在维斯塔潘与汉密尔顿的赛车碰撞中,HALO系统让汉密尔顿逃过一劫。

D | HALO系统自2018赛季被引入F1赛场,架在车手头部上方的该装置因形状而被车迷戏称为“人字拖”。这一系统能够为车手提供充分的头部保护,避免车手不受飞行杂物的侵害。在F1官方的描述中,“HALO能够承受一辆双层巴士的重量”。不过,由于这一系统增加了7公斤重量,以及外观设计原因影响了车辆重心稳定和底盘承受力,这一变化增加了各车队的调试和研发成本。此外,由于该系统安装在座舱前方,会对赛车手视线产生一定干扰,不少车手对这一装置非常不满。

E | 格罗斯让曾对HALO坚决反对,但在2020年F1巴林站的比赛中,格罗斯让的赛车失控撞上护栏,HALO系统在赛车断为两截的情况下保住车手性命。

F | 此后格罗斯让认为这一系统是F1带来的最伟大成果。

Current article:http://81uu.cuozubeishenjingli.cfd/news/20260826_228899.html

Published on:20:03:47